A US consumer watchdog has called on regulators to introduce mandatory protections for users of peer-to-peer (P2P) payment apps, as the battle against authorised push payment (APP) fraud continues to escalate.
Following the publication of its聽, Consumer Reports has urged the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to force payment firms to provide more protection to users against P2P fraud and scams.
The consumer advocate is calling on the CFPB to amend聽 to provide 鈥渓iability protection鈥 for fraudulently induced transactions.
In addition, the watchdog wants the updated rule to provide 鈥渕ore generous鈥 liability protection for unauthorised transactions.
鈥淲e believe consumers should be protected from fraudulently induced payments because companies are in a much better position to put in place safeguards to address these issues than individual consumers,鈥 said the group.
鈥淒espite the increasing risk and harm of fraud and scams on P2P services, companies have made no pro-consumer changes to their policies.鈥
Proposed measures of protection
Although Consumer Reports did not specify what exactly an amended Regulation E should look like, the group did propose several measures that P2P firms could implement voluntarily ahead of statutory changes.
For example, it argued that firms should implement a mandatory 24-hour holding period for transactions of $500 to $750 or more.
It said this should include an option for consumers to 鈥渙verride鈥 a previously authorised payment by providing additional verification.
Similarly, Consumer Reports called on firms to implement a universal 12-to-24-hour window during which all payments can be 鈥渆asily reversed鈥 by consumers.
Firms should commit to improving the transparency and thoroughness of internal investigation procedures, and should 鈥渕ore fully鈥 reimburse victims of 鈥渟ophisticated鈥 induced fraud, it said.
Consumer Reports would also like to see enhanced controls for parents whose minor children use P2P platform Zelle.
These could include: 1) the ability to disable Zelle in their minor child鈥檚 online banking app; 2) mandatory approval or denial of transactions initiated by minors; and 3) real-time transaction notifications for parents.
Why current policies aren鈥檛 working
At present, Regulation E stipulates that banks and credit unions must reimburse customers for unauthorised electronic funds transfers. This covers unauthorised credit and debit card transactions, as well as P2P transactions.
However, authorised transactions currently have no reimbursement protection under US law.聽
Zelle is currently the only P2P platform in the US that offers some form of voluntary reimbursement protection for victims of APP fraud.
In June 2023, Zelle introduced a new policy to reimburse victims of 鈥渜ualifying鈥 impostor scams. However, the P2P service does not publicly reveal what constitutes a 鈥渜ualifying鈥 impostor scam under this policy, in an effort not to incentivise future scammers.
Lawmakers have also drawn attention to the downward trend in reimbursements offered to Zelle users.
In July this year, a Senate聽 found that Zelle鈥檚 three largest owner banks reimbursed victims of Zelle scams just 38 percent of the time in 2023, down from 62 percent in 2019.
The reimbursement picture is further complicated by disparate user service agreements depending on whether Zelle is accessed directly via the Zelle app or via a third-party banking app.
鈥淲hile Zelle has its own policies, when used through a bank鈥檚 app, the bank鈥檚 policies apply,鈥 said Consumer Reports. 鈥淭his dual nature means consumers may be subject to different terms depending on how they access Zelle.鈥
Potential legislation targeting P2P platforms
The latest study from Consumer Reports is not the first time the watchdog has called for regulators and lawmakers to do more to protect users of P2P payment apps.
In 2022, Consumer Reports made a聽 of the four largest P2P platforms in the US 鈥 Zelle, Venmo, Cash App and Apple Cash 鈥 and found that their fraud and scam protections are 鈥渘ot keeping pace鈥 with adoption.
Prior to its latest study, the watchdog had also voiced support for lawmakers that are trying to pass new legislation to increase consumer protections on P2P platforms.
In August, for example, Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) introduced the聽.
The act seeks to amend the Electronic Fund Transfer Act to treat fraudulently induced electronic fund transfers 鈥渋n the same manner鈥 as unauthorised electronic fund transfers.
The bill, which is endorsed by Consumer Reports and 48 other advocates, was read twice and referred to the Senate Banking Committee, of which Blumenthal is a current member.
Four days after introducing the bill, Blumenthal also called on the CFPB to聽open a formal investigation into the 鈥渕ishandling鈥 of fraud claims by Zelle and by other P2P payment services.


