91天堂原創

UK鈥檚 FCA Wants To Restrict Cash Deposits At Post Office Branches

April 26, 2023
Back
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has announced a new series of measures that are designed to reduce the risk of money laundering through Post Office banking services.

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has announced a new series of measures that are designed to reduce the risk of money laundering through Post Office banking services.

In partnership with the National Economic Crime Centre (NECC), the FCA is asking banks to consider adjusting the terms of their Post Office banking agreements to help fight cash-based money laundering.

The FCA鈥檚 include reducing cash deposit limits at Post Office branches to below their current level of 拢20,000 per transaction.

At present, the 拢20,000 per transaction limit applies only to personal account customers, and there is no limit to how many cash deposits a customer can make in a single day.

According to the NECC, this has led to the cash deposit service being abused by criminals, who have used it to launder 鈥渉undreds of millions of pounds鈥 since 2020, as per the agency鈥檚 estimates.

Going forward, the FCA has proposed that banks reduce cash deposit limits to 拢1,000 per transaction per day for individuals, and no more than 拢10,000 over a 12-month period.

Currently, there are no limits for business accounts when depositing cash using Post Office branches, and the FCA has said it considers this to be appropriate.

Instead, the FCA has asked banks to use a 鈥渄ata-led approach鈥 to impose reasonable controls on cash deposits by businesses.

Speaking to VIXIO, an FCA spokesperson said: the 鈥渒ey point鈥 is that different banks have different customer profiles that cannot be accommodated by a one-size-fits-all policy.

鈥淲hat is a suitable limit for a big bank with large cash-intensive business chain customers might not be the same as what is a suitable limit for the customers of a smaller bank,鈥 he said.

鈥淲e are asking the banks to use their own customer data to determine appropriate limits for their customer base 鈥 such as type of customer and frequency of transactions.

鈥淎 key theme underpinning all of this is making sure legitimate customers can still deposit.鈥

Other recommendations

Other recommendations put forward by the FCA include 鈥渕oving away鈥 from paying-in slips and ensuring that card-based transactions are used where possible when depositing cash.

Currently, only that offer Everyday Banking via the Post Office allow personal accounts to deposit cash using only a paying-in slip, while 14 banks allow this for business accounts.

The FCA also urged banks to improve their transaction monitoring capabilities, speed up submissions of suspicious activity reports (SARs) and share data with the FCA, other firms and law enforcement.

Nick Parfitt, anti-money laundering lead at financial risk ops platform Feedzai, said the FCA鈥檚 recommendations highlight 鈥渇undamental areas鈥 where banks鈥 risk strategies, monitoring and reporting systems will need to change.

鈥淭echnology is a key enabler to achieving this through the use of advanced analytics, machine learning and AI, as well as being able to operate at scale given the huge transaction volumes the Post Office generates,鈥 he said.

鈥淣etwork analysis of Post Office branches, transactional and customer pattern analysis coupled with the ability to share SAR intelligence between member banks requires advanced technology and tooling.鈥

He also noted that although data-sharing has traditionally been a 鈥渃ore capability鈥 for fraud prevention, it is 鈥渂ig change鈥 for the prevention of money laundering.

Are the FCA鈥檚 recommendations proportionate?

For some observers, the FCA鈥檚 recommendations are excessive. Ron Delnevo, chair of the UK Payment Choice Alliance, told VIXIO that the 拢1,000 per transaction limit for individuals is needlessly low, given the lack of data behind it.

鈥淚s this genuinely a major concern or are there elements of a scare story here,鈥 he said. 鈥淲hat are the actual money laundering figures as a percentage of those cash deposits?

鈥淒ramatic and colourful headlines about 鈥樷 capture the public's imagination 鈥 but what鈥檚 the reality behind the headlines?鈥

Aside from the NECC鈥檚 鈥渆stimates鈥 quoted above, the FCA鈥檚 announcement included a to data published in 2020 by the UK Financial Intelligence Unit (UKFIU).

At the time, the UKFIU said it had seen an increase in suspicious cash deposits at Post Office branches.

In the first five months of 2018, the agency said it received 373 SARs related to these transactions, and in the first five months of 2018 it received 710, almost double.

However, the agency did not state how many of these SARs ultimately led to prosecutions or convictions.

鈥淭he NECC should be required to validate their estimates,鈥 said Delnevo. 鈥淥r are we going to be told that 鈥榝or security reasons鈥 we cannot be given more details?鈥

He added that 鈥99.9 percent鈥 of cash depositors are not money launderers, but this reality is not reflected in the FCA鈥檚 recommendations.

鈥淐ash has to be the 鈥楤ig Bad Wolf鈥,鈥 he said. 鈥淓ven though 鈥 as the government conceded in a 鈥 it is digital scams that are costing the British billions of pounds each year.鈥

Our premium content is available to users of our services.

To view articles, please Log-in to your account. Alternatively, if you would like to gain access to the tools that will help you navigate compliance risk with confidence please get in touch today.

Opt in to hear about webinars, events, industry and product news

Still can鈥檛 find what you鈥檙e looking for?
Get in touch to speak to a member of our team, and we鈥檒l do our best to answer.
Contact us
No items found.