An Indian appellate court has ordered Google to deposit 10 percent of two penalty fines that it received for abuse of its position before it will grant its motion to appeal.
Last week, India鈥檚 National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) to a request by Google to postpone the deadline for payment of two fines, due to the technology firm鈥檚 intention to appeal both rulings.
Although the NCLAT denied Google鈥檚 motion to postpone, it admitted Google鈥檚 motion to appeal, but only on the condition that the tech giant pays 10 percent of the fines.
In October last year, as reported by VIXIO, Google was to pay 鈧9.4bn ($114m) by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) for excluding third parties from both app store and in-app payments.
In the same month, the CCI also Google to pay 鈧13.8bn ($167m) for favouring its own proprietary applications, such as Play Store, Google Search, Google Chrome and YouTube, on Android devices.
As is standard, Google was given 60 days to pay the two penalty fees, which were issued five days apart respectively. On the day of the first deadline, Google submitted its appeal against both rulings to the NCLAT.
Responding to Google鈥檚 request for postponement of the two fine payments, the NCLAT remarked that Google had shown 鈥渘o such urgency鈥 to submit its appeal.
The NCLAT added that Google鈥檚 slow-walking of its response is also the reason for the 鈥渟hort鈥 timeframe it has been given to prepare for the 鈥渇inal hearing鈥 of the appeal.
Subject to payment of the 10 percent within the next three weeks, the final hearing will take place on April 3, 2023.
'Copy-paste' claims
Google has also said it intends to appeal the two rulings based on accusations that the CCI has 鈥減lagiarised鈥 parts of its case from similar lawsuits brought by the European Commission.
In a court filing shared with Reuters, which has not yet been made public, Google said it has found more than 50 instances of 鈥渃opy-pasting鈥 from the European Commission, some of which was used 鈥渨ord-for-word鈥 by the CCI.
Google believes that the CCI is attempting to use evidence against it that was deployed by the commission, but which has not been examined in India.
Dino Kandiloros, legal associate at Outlier Ventures, a UK-based Web3 accelerator, told VIXIO that Google's accusations of plagiarism "must" be taken seriously.
"Judicial or regulatory plagiarism, in which a judge or regulator copies significant portions of a delivered judgment into their own ruling without proper attribution, can raise questions about the legal reasoning and its relevance to the specific case," he said.
"If Google's claims are true, the Appellate Tribunal may decide not to uphold the CCI's order."
Between 2017 and 2019, Google was fined more than 鈧8bn by the European Commission for three major antitrust violations related to its , and .
The charges in the first two cases overlap with one of the CCI鈥檚 rulings against Google, but the third case is unrelated. Moreover, the commission had not accused Google of anti-competitive practices due to its app store or in-app payments policies.
Google had submitted numerous appeals against all three rulings by the European Commission. In September last year, Google against the largest fine, but managed to have it reduced by 5 percent.
In 2021, the tech giant lost an appeal against the EU for abuse of its Google Shopping search and comparison tool.
This year, Google expects to hear a decision on its appeal against the EU鈥檚 abuse of online advertising complaint.
India follows EU lead on tackling monopolies
According to the CCI, Google has placed unlawful restrictions on competition by requiring that Android app developers route all app purchases and in-app purchases through Google鈥檚 own billing system.
鈥淢aking access to the Play Store dependent on mandatory usage of Google Play Billing System for paid apps and in-app purchases is one-sided and arbitrary and devoid of any legitimate business interest,鈥 said the CCI.
鈥淭he app developers are left bereft of the inherent choice to use payment processors of their liking from the open market.鈥
In addition to the penalty fine, the CCI has ordered Google to cease and desist from the anti-competitive practices described in its complaint.
鈥淕oogle shall allow and not restrict app developers from using any third-party billing or payment processing services, either for in-app purchases or for purchasing apps,鈥 said the CCI.
鈥淕oogle shall also not discriminate or otherwise take any adverse measures against such apps using third-party billing or payment processing services, in any manner.鈥
Additionally, the CCI ruled that Google's licensing of its Play Store "shall not be linked with the requirement of pre-installing" Google Search services, the Chrome browser, YouTube or other Google applications.
According to data , in 2020 Android had a 95 percent share of the smartphone operating system market in India, with its closest rival, Apple鈥檚 iOS, coming in at 3 percent.
