Singapore is moving towards becoming one of the first jurisdictions to regulate stablecoins, after the central bank finalised a regulatory framework that could soon become law.
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has a of a proposed regulatory framework for stablecoins in an effort to ensure that asset-referenced tokens are both liquid and secure.
Under the proposed framework, stablecoins pegged to the Singapore dollar or any other G10 currency will fall within the scope of the regulations.
The stablecoin must be a single-currency stablecoin, i.e. no baskets of currencies allowed, and must also be issued from within Singapore.
To issue a regulated stablecoin in Singapore, issuers must fulfil certain key requirements related to stability, capital, redemption and disclosure.
Reserve assets must be held in low-risk, highly liquid assets, and must be valued at 100 percent or more of all outstanding tokens at all times.
In addition, reserve assets must be held in segregated accounts managed by eligible custodians. Custodians can be located either within Singapore or overseas, but must have a minimum credit rating of 鈥淎-鈥.
Firms must have a minimum base capital of S$1m ($734,000) to issue stablecoins in Singapore, and issuers must demonstrate that they have a minimum level of liquid assets to meet operating expenses.
Issuers must be able to offer a direct legal claim for redemption at par value, and all redemption requests must be met within five business days of receipt. Redemption conditions must also be 鈥渞easonable鈥 and disclosed 鈥渦pfront鈥.
Further disclosures are required regarding the technical specifications of the stablecoin, its 鈥渧alue-stabilising mechanism鈥, the rights of stablecoin holders and the auditing of reserve assets.
Penalties for non-compliance
Issuers that meet these requirements at launch, but fail to comply at a later date, may be required to pursue an 鈥渙rderly wind-down鈥 of business.
Only issuers that fulfil all the requirements under the framework may apply for their stablecoin to be recognised and labelled as a 鈥淢AS-regulated stablecoin鈥.
As noted by the MAS, this label will enable users to readily distinguish regulated stablecoins from other digital payment tokens.
Any person or organisation that misrepresents a token as an 鈥淢AS-regulated stablecoin鈥 may be subject to a fine or imprisonment, and may be placed on the MAS Investor Alert List.
Ho Hern Shin, deputy managing director of financial supervision at the MAS, said the framework aims to establish stablecoins as a 鈥渃redible digital medium of exchange鈥 and a bridge between fiat and digital currencies.
鈥淲e encourage issuers who would like their stablecoins recognised as 鈥楳AS regulated stablecoins鈥 to make early preparations for compliance,鈥 she said.
The MAS added that the regulatory framework takes into account the feedback it received following a published in October last year.
A global trend
The finalisation of the framework means that Singapore is likely to become one of the first jurisdictions to introduce dedicated rules for stablecoin issuers and custodians.
In June, the UK passed a law that will see stablecoins come under the remit of 鈥渞egulated activities鈥, although the specific provisions of the law have .
Hong Kong has also conducted a public consultation on stablecoins that could lead to similar regulations being introduced next year.
And last June, as covered by VIXIO, Japan became the first jurisdiction in the world to pass a stablecoin law.
Will issuers flock to Singapore?
The passage of the framework is likely to put Singapore on the map as a go-to destination for stablecoin issuers.
The framework is further strengthened by the fact that it excludes 鈥渕ulti-jurisdictional issuance鈥 from its scope.
In other words, if a stablecoin wants to be recognised as a 鈥淢AS-regulated stablecoin鈥, it must be issued solely from within Singapore.
The MAS considered several approaches to include non-Singapore-issued stablecoins within the framework, but found all to be 鈥減ractically difficult鈥.
These options included recognising stablecoins that are issued in jurisdictions with 鈥渞egulatory equivalence鈥, or imposing technical standards that could show where each token was issued.
Although neither of these options was pursued at this time, the MAS added that it is not entirely opposed to pursuing these options in future.
鈥淭he MAS will continue to monitor regulatory and technical developments relating to stablecoins, and consider formal regulatory cooperation mechanisms with other jurisdictions as stablecoin regulations mature over time,鈥 it said.
One major stablecoin issuer that is well positioned for the framework to become law is US firm Circle, issuer of USD Coin or USDC.
In June, Circle a licence as a Major Payment Institution (MPI) in Singapore.
The licence allows Circle鈥檚 Singapore subsidiary to offer digital payment token services, alongside cross-border money transfer services and domestic money transfer services.
Jeremy Allaire, co-founder and CEO of Circle, said that Singapore is 鈥渋ntegral鈥 to Circle鈥檚 global expansion plans.
鈥淲e are honoured to receive the MPI licence from MAS, and we remain committed to being a part of Singapore鈥檚 dynamic economy by advancing the future of financial technology innovations in the city-state,鈥 he said.
In total, it took Circle little more than a year to receive the MPI licence, after it first in Singapore in May 2022.


