The U.S. Supreme Court has rejected an effort to overturn online sports betting in Florida, denying a request by West Flagler Associates and Bonita-Fort Myers Corp. to hear their petition questioning the legality of a 2021 gaming compact between the state and the Seminole Tribe.
The decision by the Supreme Court not to take up the case practically closes the door on federal legal challenges to the landmark gaming compact that exclusively enables the tribe to operate online sports betting in Florida through July 2051.
鈥淭he Seminole Tribe of Florida applauds today鈥檚 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to decline consideration of the case involving the tribe鈥檚 gaming compact with the state of Florida,鈥 Gary Bitner, a spokesman for the tribe, said in an email.
鈥淚t means members of the Seminole Tribe and all Floridians can count on a bright future made possible by the compact.鈥
Monday鈥檚 (June 17) Supreme Court decision was not unanimous as Justice Brett Kavanaugh voted to grant the petition for writ of certiorari. Justice Ketanji Brown did not participate in the consideration or decision on this petition, according to the high court.
The Supreme Court justices conferenced on June 13 regarding West Flagler鈥檚 lawsuit against the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) before issuing its decision on Monday. It was widely expected that West Flagler鈥檚 petition for writ of certiorari would be denied.
The petition was West Flager鈥檚 final chance before the federal courts to overturn a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in June 2023 that reversed a federal judge鈥檚 earlier decision that the compact violated the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) by authorizing the Seminoles to conduct off-reservation sports betting.聽
Under the compact, the tribe are allowed to take sports bets through a so-called 鈥渉ub and spoke鈥 model in which all wagers are accepted via servers on tribal land.
Bitner declined to comment on whether the Supreme Court鈥檚 decision will now open the door to the Seminole Tribe seeking negotiations to amend the compact again to also offer online slot machines and table games across the state.
Messages left Monday with West Flagger鈥檚 attorney Hamish Hume, with Boies Schiller Flexner in Washington, D.C., were not returned.
鈥淭oday鈥檚 decision was expected, but still very welcome news as it validates that tribes are able to offer state-wide mobile gaming under IGRA,鈥 said Scott Crowell, a prominent tribal gaming attorney and founder of Crowell Law Office Tribal Advocacy Group in Arizona.聽
鈥淭he position advocated by Florida鈥檚 cardrooms that IGRA could actually be used to prevent tribes from participating in the largest expanding sector of the gaming industry, would have turned Congressional intent in the passage of IGRA on its head," Crowell told 91天堂原創 GamblingCompliance.
At the state level, West Flagler, a licensed pari-mutuel operator, can still file a lawsuit in the Leon County Circuit Court in Tallahassee and argue that the compact violates Florida鈥檚 constitution.
鈥淚t doesn鈥檛, of course,鈥 said Bob Jarvis, professor of law at Shepard Broad College of Law at Nova Southeastern University in Fort Lauderdale. 鈥淭hat is what the Florida Supreme Court said was the proper procedure when it dismissed West Flagler鈥檚 quo warranto action, which [they] filed directly in the Florida Supreme Court.鈥
鈥淲hile it would not surprise me to see West Flagler file such a lawsuit,鈥 Jarvis said, 鈥渋t鈥檚 a further waste of time and money.鈥
In addition, Jarvis noted that West Flagler could still seek to file a federal equal protection lawsuit citing Kavanaugh.
鈥淟astly, anything is possible, so I suppose West Flagler could try to block the new DOI rule, but I don鈥檛 see how that would affect the Seminoles,鈥 he said, referring to the U.S. Department of the Interior regulations enacted earlier this year that expressly recognize the 鈥渉ub and spoke鈥 model for online gambling conducted by tribes.
Jarvis said an equal protection lawsuit would be a 鈥渘on-starter鈥 as states have long had total discretion over gambling and can favor some groups over others when awarding gambling rights.
鈥淲hy? Because gambling is a vice, and therefore does not get treated the same as, for example, a license to open a dry-cleaning business. So, I cannot imagine how a colorable equal protection argument could even be framed,鈥 Jarvis said.
Crowell added that Justice Kavanaugh 鈥渉as furthered his troubling quest of a decision looking for a lawsuit to challenge the bedrock precedent of Morton v Mancari, and its progeny, which reaffirmed that tribal preferences in federal statutes are based in the Constitution鈥檚 recognition of tribes as sovereign political bodies, rather than race-based distinctions in violation of the Equal Protection Clause.鈥
Justice Kavanaugh's vote to take up the challenge to the Seminole compact is consistent with several recent actions, Crowell added. 鈥淣otably, no other justice has joined him on this concerning agenda.鈥
The Supreme Court鈥檚 decision to deny cert to West Flagler is expected to lead to major changes in tribal gaming with the possibility of other states with exclusive tribal gaming compacts, such as Minnesota, North Dakota, and Wisconsin, potentially also looking to negotiate amendments to allow the hub-and-spoke model of sports betting.
In some states, lawmakers would have to agree to amend gaming compacts to ensure tribal control of online sports betting and potentially internet gaming, while any compact amendments also would require federal approval in line with the new DOI rules.
鈥淚 think this is going to work a big change in tribal gaming, as I expect many tribes to now press for the same spoke-and-hub system that the Seminoles got from Florida,鈥 Jarvis said.
鈥淚n some ways, however, this is an inevitable change 鈥 after all, once a state allows in-person betting, how much of a leap is it to allow mobile betting? Obviously, not much.鈥
Jarvis said the same legal principles also apply to iGaming, which is 鈥渢he next big thing and will be here before anyone realizes it.鈥
Mobile sports betting was just the camel鈥檚 nose in the tent, he added.聽