91天堂原創

UK Premier League Teams Diverging On Gambling Sponsorships

July 6, 2023
Back
English Premier League clubs Chelsea and Brentford F.C. have taken differing approaches to backlash from fans to their team's gambling sponsorship plans, as the relationship between UK football and the industry become ever more complex.

Body

English Premier League clubs Chelsea and Brentford F.C. have taken differing approaches to backlash from fans to their team's gambling sponsorship plans, as the relationship between UK football and the industry become ever more complex.

Chelsea has reportedly ended discussions with Stake.com to be its front-of-shirt sponsor for next year, reportedly due to pressure from fans.

The decision to drop the company, which already appears on fellow Premier League club Everton鈥檚 shirt, follows a demand from Chelsea鈥檚 Supporters Trust to reject the deal after it warned that associating with an online casino and betting company is not 鈥渋n the best interest of our members鈥.

Members of the trust voted overwhelmingly against the planned deal after an 鈥渦rgent question鈥 was put to them. More than 77 percent 鈥渟trongly disagreed鈥 (62 percent) or disagreed (16 percent) with the deal.

On June 18, the trust wrote an to Chelsea co-owner Todd Boehly explaining how it believed the deal would negatively impact the work done by Chelsea鈥檚 charity foundation and isolate a large group of supporters.

Chelsea鈥檚 fans appear to have ultimately succeeded in their aim to avoid a gambling sponsor; however, their West London neighbours in Brentford have not.

On July 4, Brentford mens first team revealed its new kit for the next two seasons with South Africa-based Hollywoodbets as the front-shirt sponsor, despite reports that the club had been searching for a non-gambling sponsor following a recent major controversy with one of its players.

On May 17, 2023, Brentford star player Ivan Toney was handed a suspension from all football and football-related activity for breaches of the Football Association鈥檚 (FA) betting rules.

The FA the eight-month suspension with immediate effect, as well as a 拢50,000 fine and a warning for Toney.

Jay Harris, a Brentford鈥檚 reporter at the Athletic, said on social media following the new kit unveiling: 鈥淏y sticking with the gambling firm, despite Ivan Toney鈥檚 ban for breaching the FA鈥檚 betting rules, the club has made the wrong call.鈥

Many Brentford fans share Harris鈥 view, including the Brentford Independent Association of Supporters (BIAS), responding to the club's announcement on social media with disappointment at the choice of sponsor.

The attitudes of both the Chelsea and Brentford fans appear to reflect a wider shifting mood among fans in the country towards sports relationships with gambling sponsors.

On June 30, charity Gambling With Lives responded to the findings of a survey conducted by the Football Supporters Association, a body that represents fans in England and Wales, which found that 73 percent of the around 10,000 football fans questioned agreed with the statement: 鈥淚 am concerned about the amount of gambling advertising and sponsorship in football.鈥

The Premier League has entered into a voluntary agreement between the clubs to end shirt-front sponsorship from the end of the 2025/26 season.

However, gambling sponsors will still be able to appear on shirt sleeves and other pieces of attire such as training tops, as well as on the highly visible pitch-side hoardings during games.

It appears unlikely that sport sponsorship rules will change anytime soon.

Speaking during the Westminster Media Forum on the next steps for football governance in England on June 15, Ben Dean, a director of sport and gambling at the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport (DCMS), said he believes the Premier League's voluntary front of shirt gambling sponsorship ban represents 鈥減roportionate鈥 action.

鈥淲e were most worried about appealing to children and young adults. The strongest link there was with Premier League players, where children want to wear the shirts of their favourite players, so stopping that was a priority for us,鈥 Dean said.

When asked by VIXIO GamblingCompliance if the DCMS would take more action to curb gambling sponsorships, Dean rejected the idea, explaining that many of the lower football leagues are currently dealing with multiple financial challenges and the government does not want to add to their woes.

Our premium content is available to users of our services.

To view articles, please Log-in to your account. Alternatively, if you would like to gain access to the tools that will help you navigate compliance risk with confidence please get in touch today.

Opt in to hear about webinars, events, industry and product news

Still can鈥檛 find what you鈥檙e looking for?
Get in touch to speak to a member of our team, and we鈥檒l do our best to answer.
Contact us
No items found.