91天堂原創

Ontario Online Model Upheld By Superior Court

May 14, 2024
Back
Addressing one of the key legal issues for online gambling in Canada, the Ontario Superior Court has ruled that the province鈥檚 competitive model for iGaming does not violate restrictions on regulated gambling established by the Canadian Criminal Code.
Body

Addressing one of the key legal issues for online gambling in Canada, the Ontario Superior Court has ruled that the province鈥檚 competitive model for iGaming does not violate restrictions on regulated gambling established by the Canadian Criminal Code.

In a聽 published on Monday (May 13), Superior Court of Justice judge Lisa Brownstone agreed that the first-of-its-kind regulatory model launched by iGaming Ontario (iGO) in April 2022 does not contradict the Criminal Code鈥檚 requirements for provincial governments to 鈥渃onduct and manage鈥 casino gaming and other commercial gambling activities within their jurisdictions.

The ruling addresses a legal challenge filed later in 2022 by the Mohawk Council of Kahnawake, the First Nation located near Montreal that also issues licences for online gambling operators serving Canadian and international markets.听聽

Justice Brownstone agreed that the Mohawk Council did have sufficient legal standing to file the case.

However, she ruled against the council鈥檚 claims that iGO violates the 鈥渃onduct and manage鈥 requirement of Section 207(1)(a) of the Criminal Code on the basis that operators own their platforms, procure their own suppliers and retain the majority of the revenue they generate, among other arguments.

The Ontario government established iGO in 2021 as an independent subsidiary of the province鈥檚 gambling regulator, the Alcohol Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO), to contract with registered commercial operators to offer casino games and sports wagering to Ontarians on its behalf. Previously, the government-owned Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation was the only entity authorised to offer online gambling within the province.

The judge noted that Ontario鈥檚 private operators are restricted to offering only iGO-approved games and require pre-approval in the use of player data, with iGO also in charge of dispute resolution and all policies related to responsible gambling, game integrity and player awareness.听

鈥淭he controls are detailed and extensive. They show that iGO retains ultimate decision-making authority on a breadth of issues central to the igaming scheme,鈥 Justice Brownstone wrote.听

鈥淚t retains a high degree of control over the operators in a wide array of the igaming scheme鈥檚 aspects. These are markers of who is in control of the igaming scheme, and who is its operating mind. That operating mind is iGO.鈥

As of Monday evening, it was not clear whether the Mohawk council would seek to appeal the ruling before Ontario鈥檚 highest court, the Court of Appeal.

Had the Superior Court judge ruled in favour of the Mohawk鈥檚 legal challenge, it would have imperiled a regulated online gambling market that has already become one of the largest in the world and is now served by nearly 50 registered operators.

In a statement welcoming Monday鈥檚 ruling, iGaming Ontario executive director Martha Otton said the provincial agency had 鈥渁lways been confident in our model鈥.

鈥淥ntario鈥檚 model meets the requirements and contributes to the public good by protecting players, their data and their funds, while helping to fund priority public services in Ontario, and bringing well-paid, high-tech jobs and economic development to Ontario,鈥 Otton added.听

International Liquidity Also In Focus

The legal challenge brought by the Mohawk Council of Kahnawake is not the only major legal issue hanging over Ontario鈥檚 regulated market.

Amid persistent lobbying by the Canadian Gaming Association (CGA) and other industry groups, the Ontario government in February approved a so-called order in council to formally ask the Court of Appeal of Ontario to separately consider whether the Criminal Code permits provinces to enable gambling activities in which local residents may compete against players in international jurisdictions.

The AGCO has to date not allowed for international liquidity聽under the province鈥檚 regulatory regime.

As a result, leading fantasy sports and poker operators such as Flutter and DraftKings have withdrawn peer-to-peer products from the Ontario market, even as they have launched regulated online casino and sports-betting offerings in the province.

The lack of international liquidity for poker games is a material reason why iGO鈥檚 own studies indicate that around 14 percent of online gambling in the province continues to take place with offshore sites, according to Canadian industry executives speaking at last week鈥檚 SBC Summit North America in New Jersey.

Prior to 2022, Ontario 鈥渉ad a very strong poker market, daily fantasy business, a lot of other things that had to [go] away鈥, said Paul Burns, CEO and president of the CGA, which has filed for intervenor status in the case being brought before the Ontario Court of Appeal.

鈥淭he government is requesting the Ontario Court of Appeal to give them some advice and direction that international liquidity would be permitted under the Criminal Code of Canada, and that's a step that would definitely go to bringing back the poker market,鈥 said Burns.

Whether Ontario will be able to continue to grow its channelization rate from the illegal market depends largely 鈥渙n the outcome of that question鈥 of liquidity, agreed Bruce Caughill, managing director of Rush Street Interactive in Canada and former general counsel of the AGCO.

鈥淭hat remaining piece to channel was a big piece that was impacted by the decision not to include international liquidity on launch, so we expect to see that later this year,鈥 Caughill told SBC Summit delegates.

The Court of Appeal is currently scheduled to hear the petition of the Ontario Attorney General on November 26-28 of this year, according to the .听

Aside from the CGA, other parties seeking intervenor status in the case include PokerStars-owner Flutter, as well as GGPoker-operator NSUS Group.

The Attorney General of British Columbia plus provincial lottery corporations from British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Atlantic Canadian provinces are also seeking to intervene in order to provide evidence in opposition to international liquidity for Ontario-registered operators, according to recent court filings.

Additional reporting by Matt Carey.

Our premium content is available to users of our services.

To view articles, please Log-in to your account. Alternatively, if you would like to gain access to the tools that will help you navigate compliance risk with confidence please get in touch today.

Opt in to hear about webinars, events, industry and product news

Still can鈥檛 find what you鈥檙e looking for? Get in touch to speak to a member of our team, and we鈥檒l do our best to answer.
No items found.