The Norwegian Gambling Authority (NGA) has said that companies it has claimed were operating illegally in Norway, including Betsson and Kindred, have begun to withdraw.
The regulator named Kindred Group brands Unibet, Maria Casino, Bingo.com and Storspiller; Betsson brands including Betsson, Betsafe, Nordicbet, Casinoeuro and NorgesAutomaten; bet365; and ComeOn and its brands Folkeriket, GetLucky, Mobilebet and Mobilautomaten.
The withdrawals show 鈥渢hat regulation has an effect鈥, the regulator said in a 聽on Thursday (September 14). 鈥淚t has become much more difficult for the illegal companies to operate in Norway.鈥
So far, Hillside, the unit of bet365 operating in Norway, has been cleared from the possibility of fines, while the others have yet to pass review, 鈥渁s they have yet not presented us with a satisfying action plan for changes in the way they offer gambling in Norway鈥, said Trude Gjeitanger H酶gseth Feld, a lawyer for the authority, in response to emailed questions.
For several years, the regulator has been pressuring online gambling companies to leave Norway and has recently been granted increased powers by the government, which has aggressively defended its gambling monopolies, Norsk Tipping and Norsk Rikstoto.
Pressure to stop gambling advertising has succeeded and a ban on payment processing 鈥渨orks well鈥, the regulator claims.
Kindred and Betsson have previously been ordered to leave Norway, while in August, bet365 and ComeOn were warned that the authority believed it had legal grounds to stop them from doing business there.
Contacted for comment, Kindred said it has a 鈥渓ong-term of objective鈥 of gaining a licence in Norway.
鈥淲e are of the opinion that we have never been on the Norwegian market, but offer gambling as a service on the international entertainment market pursuant to a licence from Malta,鈥 a spokesperson said.
鈥淣orwegian residents have legally and at their own free will chosen to participate in our offer,鈥 the spokeswoman said.
But 鈥渄isagreements鈥 with the NGA led to Kindred making changes that it believes have met the regulator鈥檚 requirements since 2019, with changes including moving from Norwegian language to English, the change of website name from a Norwegian word, moving to a so-called 鈥渄ot.com鈥 site and discontinuing 鈥渁ll advertising and marketing activities鈥 in the country, the spokeswoman said.
In a statement, trade group the Norwegian Industry Association for Online Games (NBO) said its members 鈥渁re established and regulated in other jurisdictions and offer their services based on the fundamental freedoms secured by the [European Economic Area] agreement鈥.
鈥淣BO members are responsible and have, because of dialogue with Norwegian authorities, adapted their offer,鈥 the group said. 鈥淣orwegians may still use the services legally offered by NBO鈥檚 members in the international market, meaning offers not directed at the Norwegian market.鈥
Contacted for comment, a ComeOn spokesperson said it was 鈥渇ully supportive鈥 of NBO鈥檚 position.
The European Gaming and Betting Association (EGBA) argued that 鈥渘eighbouring countries like Sweden and Finland have already recognised the benefits of transitioning from a monopoly system to a licensing model, leaving Norway as the only country in mainland Europe committed to an exclusive gambling monopoly鈥.
鈥淲e strongly urge the Norwegian authorities to consider the advantages of a licensing model, which can effectively meet the evolving needs of its players and foster a more comprehensive approach to gambling regulation that prioritises player safety,鈥 said secretary-general Maarten Haijer.
鈥淭hat several of the largest gambling companies that operate illegally in Norway withdraw, will prevent gambling problems and contribute to a safer and more responsible gambling offer in the Norwegian market,鈥 according to Henrik Nordal, director of the Norwegian Lottery Authority, sister to the NGA.
But the NGA is monitoring several other websites, and is 鈥減repared to start several cases unless the illegal companies actively inform us that they intend to leave Norway鈥, H酶gseth Felde said.
One clear solution would be for any of what the regulator calls 鈥渋llegal companies鈥 to start geoblocking, she said, that is, block access to websites from Norway.
鈥淭he companies will have to make their own decisions on how to comply with Norwegian law, and we are prepared to offer advice should they wish so,鈥 H酶gseth Felde said.
鈥淪hould they choose to implement other measures to comply with our warning/order we will need to assess the suggested measures to determine whether they are in compliance,鈥 she said.
Additional reporting by Joe Ewens.


