Body
A bill to end simulcast wagering on greyhound racing in Colorado is moving forward with bipartisan support in the state legislature but questions remain if fixed-odds wagering on horse races can replace the purse revenue generated by these wagers.
would prohibit simulcast wagering on greyhound races that take place from out-of-state tracks and are available at the state鈥檚 lone racetrack 鈥 Arapahoe Park 鈥 as well as at 11 off-track betting locations across the state.
Colorado banned live greyhound racing in 2014 but allowed simulcast betting to continue. In total, 42 states do not allow gambling on greyhound racing, while the only live dog racing takes place in West Virginia.
The measure, co-sponsored by Democratic House Majority Leader Monica Duran, was recently amended after some horse breeders objected to the loss of funds for racing purses.
Duran and the bill鈥檚 three other sponsors amended the measure to allow simulcast wagering to remain in effect through October 1, 2024, allowing the state鈥檚 horseracing industry to secure another source of revenue.
鈥淲e are very pleased the bill sponsors have acknowledged the inadvertent harm their bill could have done to horseracing,鈥 Jim Mulvihill, interim executive director of the Colorado Horse Racing Association (CHRA), told VIXIO GamblingCompliance Tuesday (February 7).
鈥淭he House majority and minority leaders initially saw this as a simple 'clean up' to fully eliminate the state's participation in greyhound racing but were unaware that revenue from greyhound simulcast wagering supports purses for horse racing.鈥
Mulvihill stressed that the amendment delaying implementation beyond the next two live racing meets was important to the industry and signaled that 鈥渢he legislature meant no harm to horseracing.鈥
Eliminating simulcast wagering on greyhound races would cost the state $330,330 in fiscal year 2023-2024 and $639,880 in fiscal year 2024-2025, according to a five-page revised fiscal note by the Legislative Council Staff. A 0.75 percent tax rate is levied on gross receipts from wagering.
The report also found that implementing a wagering ban would cost the supplemental horseracing purse fund $128,675 in the current fiscal year, rising to $244,180 in 2024-2025.
Mike Lynch, Republican House Minority Leader and a co-sponsor of HB 1041, said amending the bill gave the industry 鈥渢wo more meets to get revenue and get their feet under themselves before they move on.鈥
Arapahoe Park, a Bally鈥檚 Corp. property, operates its mixed quarter horse and thoroughbred meet annually between July and October.
鈥淭his is a common sense clean up more than anything,鈥 Lynch told the House Finance Committee. 鈥淚f we are going to stand by our values and get rid of that racing 鈥 then we can鈥檛 allow us to gamble on it in the state.鈥
Duran agreed, telling the committee the bill simply closes a loophole and ends simulcast betting.
鈥淚t does nothing else,鈥 she said. 鈥淚t does not end horseracing, nor does it expand gambling.鈥
The amended bill was passed out of the House Finance Committee with a 10-0 vote on Monday (February 6). The bill next heads to the House Appropriations Committee.
As lawmakers look to end simulcast wagering on greyhound races, Colorado鈥檚 efforts to emulate New Jersey鈥檚 efforts with offering fixed-odds betting on horse races has yet to leave the starting gate.
Suzanne Karrer, a spokeswoman with the Colorado Division of Gaming, confirmed Tuesday (February 7) that fixed-odds wagering is available on Colorado鈥檚 approved sports-betting catalog, but 鈥渘o operators are offering it yet.鈥
Regulations approved by the Colorado Limited Gaming Control Commission in March 2022 apply principles to fixed-odds betting, in that they require agreements between sports-betting operators, Arapahoe Park, and horsemen鈥檚 groups in the state, out-of-state and internationally.
Local horsemen and Arapahoe Park would also have to grant approval for out-of-state quarter horse and thoroughbred races to be offered with fixed-odds in Colorado.
鈥淭he horsemen and the track have been working together to make fixed-odds work for everyone,鈥 said Mulvihill.
鈥淚t's been a long process but we want to get it right,鈥 Mulvihill said. 鈥淭his means making it a win for the horsemen, the track, the bookmakers, and the horseplayers. That's a tough balance to strike but we're getting closer and I do believe we will be live with fixed-odds wagering in 2023.鈥
